California shifts privacy enforcement from audits to technical tests
California regulators are moving beyond policy audits to technical verification ('pen-testing') of privacy compliance, as highlighted by a recent $12.75 million settlement with General Motors. This development indicates a shift towards more rigorous enforcement of privacy regulations, requiring companies to demonstrate actual technical adherence rather than just documented policies.
Key Takeaways
- General Motors reached a $12.75 million settlement tied to California privacy enforcement.
- California regulators are no longer relying on simple policy audits.
- The article says regulators are now “pen-testing” actual technical controls.
- The focus has shifted from “paper compliance” to technical verification.
Why It Matters
This raises the bar for privacy compliance: companies may need to prove their controls work in practice, not just document them on paper. For streaming platforms and ad-tech vendors handling consumer data, that means privacy programs may face more technical scrutiny, not only legal review. The settlement also signals a more hands-on enforcement posture from California regulators. Watch for whether future privacy actions cite technical testing or similar verification language rather than policy-based failures.
Read full article at ourtake.bakerbotts.com